Blog
- Published on
I was a little surprised the other day when I heard that a fellow artist questioned by distinction with the Federation of Canadian Artists simply because I use a projector to aid in transferring my image to canvas. First of all the artist in question holds a much lower distinction, so there may be some insecurity/jealousy on her part. I was shocked to hear her comments. The staff who spoke to her made it clear that my work earned the distinction simply on the merit of the paintings that I produce.
The residue of this conversation has me thinking about a book I read recently that blew my mind. Since about the 15 Century there is evidence that artists were using a lens to assist them in transferring an image to the painting surface. About 1420- suddenly everyone can draw better. Artists such as Caravaggio, da Vinci, Durer, Frans Hals, Ingres, Vermeer, Van Eyke, and Velasques, to name just a few. If the artists themselves were not using a lens directly the changes in the style of art after the use of the lens definitely influenced them, and every artist since.
The use of a lens in the transfer of images revolutionized the way art has been made ever since. Have you ever seen early portraits that were done only in profile or straight on? When artists starting doing 3/4 profile portraits, why was that? The use of a lens. How about perspective? Early landscape pieces have a wonky sense of space and distance. They were often quite flat and distorted. When did we start to see more representational distance in landscapes. After the lens was introduced.
Now what type of lenses am I talking about?
The residue of this conversation has me thinking about a book I read recently that blew my mind. Since about the 15 Century there is evidence that artists were using a lens to assist them in transferring an image to the painting surface. About 1420- suddenly everyone can draw better. Artists such as Caravaggio, da Vinci, Durer, Frans Hals, Ingres, Vermeer, Van Eyke, and Velasques, to name just a few. If the artists themselves were not using a lens directly the changes in the style of art after the use of the lens definitely influenced them, and every artist since.
The use of a lens in the transfer of images revolutionized the way art has been made ever since. Have you ever seen early portraits that were done only in profile or straight on? When artists starting doing 3/4 profile portraits, why was that? The use of a lens. How about perspective? Early landscape pieces have a wonky sense of space and distance. They were often quite flat and distorted. When did we start to see more representational distance in landscapes. After the lens was introduced.
Now what type of lenses am I talking about?
Camera Lucida
Camera Obscura
The book that I mentioned is written by David Hockney. Here is the link to take a closer look. (As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.)
Here is the excerpt from the book:
Join one of the most influential artists of our time as he investigates the painting techniques of the Old Masters. Hockney’s extensive research led him to conclude that artists such as Caravaggio, Velázquez, da Vinci, and other hyperrealists actually used optics and lenses to create their masterpieces.In this passionate yet pithy book, Hockney takes readers on a journey of discovery as he builds a case that mirrors and lenses were used by the great masters to create their highly detailed and realistic paintings and drawings. Hundreds of the best-known and best-loved paintings are reproduced alongside his straightforward analysis. Hockney also includes his own photographs and drawings to illustrate techniques used to capture such accurate likenesses. Extracts from historical and modern documents and correspondence with experts from around the world further illuminate this thought-provoking book that will forever change how the world looks at art.
This is David's wall of evidence for the artists works that you researched
If you are interested in the documentary, you can see it here. BBC Youtube feature.
How this all pertains to me is that I'm a business woman. I have a choice. I could spend two days transferring an image to the canvas or I can use a projector and accomplish the same thing in 45 minutes. It's neither efficient or cost effective to opt for slower techniques when there is an alternative. The fact remains, either way the painting does not paint itself. It is my mark in the line drawing and my mark in the painted representation. It is all me regardless of how the image was transferred to the painted surface.
If we naively think that there is some elite place of prestige because we don't use any technology to produce our paintings then it also means you better be mixing you paint by hand, grinding your own pigments and using egg tempera as a binder because the advent of the metal tubes of paint we buy are a result of technology.
Did the ancients use tubes of paint once they were available? You bet they did. We would not have the Impressionist period of art had it not been for portable tubes of paint.
Technology is a part of our life as it was for the ancients.
How this all pertains to me is that I'm a business woman. I have a choice. I could spend two days transferring an image to the canvas or I can use a projector and accomplish the same thing in 45 minutes. It's neither efficient or cost effective to opt for slower techniques when there is an alternative. The fact remains, either way the painting does not paint itself. It is my mark in the line drawing and my mark in the painted representation. It is all me regardless of how the image was transferred to the painted surface.
If we naively think that there is some elite place of prestige because we don't use any technology to produce our paintings then it also means you better be mixing you paint by hand, grinding your own pigments and using egg tempera as a binder because the advent of the metal tubes of paint we buy are a result of technology.
Did the ancients use tubes of paint once they were available? You bet they did. We would not have the Impressionist period of art had it not been for portable tubes of paint.
Technology is a part of our life as it was for the ancients.
0 Comments
What should I know before commissioning flower art?
Commissioning a flower painting is not only about choosing something beautiful for a wall. The right piece can become part of the emotional atmosphere of your home - something that steadies you, comforts...
What Size Should My Flower Painting Be?
While there are certainly practical things to consider, the answer is never just about measurements. It’s about how you want to feel in your space. I believe beautiful original artwork has the power...
How Long Does It Take to Paint a Custom Floral Artwork?
People ask this question often, and the truth is, it is not as simple as naming a number of hours or days. There is a process, of course. But the time it takes to create a custom floral painting depends...
Archives
- June 2026 (5)
- March 2026 (1)
- January 2026 (2)
- November 2025 (1)
- October 2024 (1)
- September 2024 (1)
- June 2024 (1)
- April 2024 (1)
- March 2024 (4)
- February 2024 (5)
- January 2024 (3)
- December 2023 (7)
- November 2023 (2)
- August 2023 (1)
- July 2023 (2)
- June 2023 (3)
- February 2023 (2)
- January 2023 (1)
- October 2022 (1)
- August 2022 (4)
- July 2022 (4)
- May 2022 (1)
- April 2022 (2)
- March 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (3)
- January 2022 (2)
- November 2021 (1)
- September 2021 (1)
- August 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (1)
- January 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (2)
- October 2020 (2)
- August 2020 (2)
- July 2020 (2)
- June 2020 (2)
- May 2020 (2)
- April 2020 (3)
- March 2020 (2)
- February 2020 (2)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)